A recent formal request from a dozen public health and agricultural labor groups is urging the US environmental regulator to discontinue permitting the spraying of antimicrobial agents on produce across the United States, pointing to superbug spread and health risks to agricultural workers.
The agricultural sector applies about 8 million pounds of antibiotic and antifungal chemicals on US plants annually, with a number of these agents restricted in foreign countries.
“Every year the public are at greater risk from harmful microbes and diseases because pharmaceutical drugs are applied on crops,” said Nathan Donley.
The excessive use of antimicrobial drugs, which are critical for treating medical conditions, as pesticides on crops threatens community well-being because it can result in superbug bacteria. In the same way, frequent use of antifungal treatments can lead to mycoses that are less treatable with currently available medicines.
Meanwhile, ingesting drug traces on produce can alter the digestive system and elevate the likelihood of chronic diseases. These agents also pollute water sources, and are believed to damage pollinators. Frequently low-income and Latino farm workers are most at risk.
Agricultural operations use antibiotics because they eliminate bacteria that can damage or destroy produce. Among the most frequently used antimicrobial treatments is a common antibiotic, which is often used in healthcare. Data indicate as much as 125k lbs have been applied on domestic plants in a annual period.
The petition is filed as the Environmental Protection Agency experiences demands to increase the utilization of human antibiotics. The crop infection, carried by the Asian citrus psyllid, is severely affecting citrus orchards in Florida.
“I appreciate their critical situation because they’re in serious trouble, but from a societal standpoint this is certainly a no-brainer – it should not be allowed,” the expert said. “The bottom line is the massive issues generated by using human medicine on edible plants significantly surpass the farming challenges.”
Experts propose simple agricultural measures that should be tried first, such as planting crops further apart, developing more robust strains of crops and detecting sick crops and promptly eliminating them to stop the pathogens from propagating.
The petition provides the Environmental Protection Agency about half a decade to act. Previously, the regulator prohibited a pesticide in response to a parallel formal request, but a legal authority overturned the agency's prohibition.
The organization can implement a prohibition, or is required to give a justification why it will not. If the EPA, or a subsequent government, fails to respond, then the coalitions can sue. The legal battle could require over ten years.
“We’re playing the extended strategy,” the advocate concluded.
Urban enthusiast and writer passionate about sustainable city living and cultural exploration.